Agenda 30 - You Will Own Nothing and Be Happy

Last Updated May 31, 2023 by Tim Trott. First Published in 2014.

1,511 words, estimated reading time 6 minutes.

Initially part of the Great Reset and Agenda 21, this is no longer a conspiracy theory but an actual plan from the WEF. Its not even secret.

Agenda 21 is now Agenda 30 with the agenda being accelerated thanks to the Covid-19 pandemic. The agenda is being fronted by the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, World Banks, Big Pharma and global elitists, collectively called "them" or "they".

Futuristic building — By 2030 You Will Own Nothing and Be Happy

In 2016 the World Economic Forum (WEF) published this blog post and this (now deleted) post which highlights some of the things we can expect leading upto 2030 - "Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better".

Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my city - or should I say, "our city". I don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or any clothes.
It might seem odd to you, but it makes perfect sense for us in this city. Everything you considered a product, has now become a service. We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives.

So what does this concept of "You Will Own Nothing and Be Happy" involve? What does it mean?

We're gradually seeing a decline in ownership of things. More and more people are renting rather than buying things like cars and houses (because they make it too expensive for most people). But it's not just the big things. Small things are almost impossible to "own".

One of the best examples is music, film and literature. It used to be that case that you went into a shop and you bought a physical copy of a book, a DVD or a CD. You own that copy and can read/listen to/watch as often as you like, where you like. You could even make copies for your own backup. No longer. They removed all your rights to make a backup copy of takes, records, CDs and DVDs in the name of copyright. If you want a backup copy, buy one. Now with streaming services and digital media taking over at a rapidly accelerating pace, you don't own anything. You pay a fee (one-off or monthly) to use the media but you own nothing. You only buy a licence to watch or use the content. If you read the terms and conditions, that licence can be revoked for any reason without notice, meaning you lose access to that content.

This has happened before and will happen again. In the case of Kindle books, they revoked a licence and blocked access to some materials "they" deem unfit. It's a digital book burning and there is nothing you can do, despite "buying" that ebook. See Amazon Removes E-Books From Kindle Store, Revokes Ownership . The same thing can happen for digital licences for music, films and even software on services like Steam.

Today, Amazon removed George Orwell's 1984 and Animal Farm from its Kindle e-book store. The company also went ahead and removed any digital trace of the books, too-striking them from both users' digital lockers and from Kindle devices. This disturbing, Orwellian move underscores how, in spite of comments otherwise, a purchase in the digital realm can't be compared to physical ownership of content.

UPDATE 02/11/2022
As a creative professional ~~I use Adobe Creative Cloud~~ used to use Adobe Creative Cloud for digital and print. As such most of my designs use Pantone colours so that they can be colour matched between screens, printers and anything else that I create. If I create a logo using a Pantone colour I can be confident that regardless of where I print it or what I print it on, the colour will be the same. But the problem with this is that Pantone colours belong to Pantone and are a closed system requiring a licence to use.

So when Pantone and Adobe fought, Pantone colours were REMOVED from Photoshop (and the rest of the Creative Cloud) and a lot of colours in most of my designs have been converted to BLACK. To use the colours again I have to pay EXTRA to Pantone to use what I had before as part of the Creative Cloud subscription. Is Adobe reducing the subscription? No, they are pocketing the licence that they would have paid Pantone.

If they can do this and hold us and our designs, hostage, what else can they do? I have now cancelled my Adobe subscription and gone back to CS3 which will not have anything removed, altered or crippled. It also won't cost me a monthly fee or hold me hostage.

Why would "they" do this? Control. They will have total control over the music you listen to, the films you watch, the clothes you wear and where you go. They will eventually start removing and deleting all traces of anything that they don't like or is harmful to them. See in the article above they mention "This disturbing, Orwellian move". Some people in the future may not know what that term means so will look it up and many even find it's a reference to a book. A book which is now banned. An "Orwellian move" now has no meaning to our future generations.

Another reason for restricting ownership and issuing revocable licences is money. Why charge someone a one-off fee of £10 for a physical DVD when you can charge £9.99 per month? Yes, you get a lot more in the £9.99 per month, but how much do you actually want to watch vs watching because it's there? In the last year, I spent £119.88 on streaming services. When I look back at my viewing history, how many films did I actually want to watch? That I would have previously gone out and bought? Less than half that amount. Plus I do not get adverts shoved down my face on a DVD, unlike streaming services.

"Smart" gadgets operate on the same principle. You buy the smart speaker/doorbell/heating/tv smart whatever and pay a subscription to use it. When the manufacturer decides it's time for you to buy a new device they can cut off access to the subscription or even brick the device remotely, forcing you to buy another. You don't own these devices if someone else has control over them.

Going back to the article from the WEF. Let's look at some of the language. Look at this series of statements.

I don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or any clothes.

Does that sound like Utopia? A place where you want to be living?

Shopping? I can't really remember what that is. For most of us, it has been turned into choosing things to use. Sometimes I find this fun, and sometimes I just want the algorithm to do it for me. It knows my taste better than I do by now.

Their vision is of a city where its population own nothing and AI seems to control every aspect of their lives. The only way AI can know this much information is through 24/7 surveillance and monitoring. Is that a place you would feel happy?

When AI and robots took over so much of our work, we suddenly had time to eat well, sleep well and spend time with other people.

Sounds like mass unemployment to me. People are so poor and impoverished that they will not even own any clothes. People will be pushed into the "smart cities" that operate on AI, 5G and the eventual 6G, and no business - the government will control every aspect of your life. This is communism taken to the next level.

If they have their way we will own nothing and be completely reliant on them to provide us with everything, even the essentials. In exchange, we give up our Human Rights and all forms of Privacy to their invasive AI.

The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.
Proverbs 22:7

If you enjoyed reading this article, or it helped you in some way, all I ask in return is you leave a comment below or share this page with your friends. Thank you.